Efecto del diseño de la ficha para el análisis de yogurt bebible de fresa por el método CATA (check-all-that-apply)

The effect of ballot design for strawberry yogurt analysis using CATA (check-all-that-apply)

Contenido principal del artículo

Miriam Ramos-Ramírez
Pilar Minaya-Agüero
Matilde Tenorio-Domínguez
Reynaldo Justino Silva-Paz

Resumen

La evaluación sensorial de alimentos se encuentra en constante evolución, donde los métodos de análisis recientemente desarrollados buscan consolidarse. Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) es un método rápido empleado para describir características sensoriales de un producto mediante una selección personalizada de términos. Sin embargo, el formato en que éstos se presentan no está estandarizado. Este estudio evaluó el efecto del diseño de cuatro fichas CATA para el análisis de yogurt bebible de fresa. Se generaron 15 descriptores con la participación de 97 consumidores; de estos descriptores 6 se relacionaron con la textura, 5 con el sabor y 2 tanto con apariencia como con el olor. Se diseñaron 4 modelos de fichas: a) columnas, b) lista vertical, c) distribución radial y d) distribución aleatoria, que fueron aplicados para caracterizar una misma marca de yogurt comercial, empleando 150 consumidores por cada modelo. La prueba Q de Cochran evidenció diferencias significativas para el color rosado, ácido/agrio, olor a fresa, cremoso, viscoso, olor a leche, y sabor artificial. De las cuatro fichas propuestas, el modelo C mostró menor variabilidad en la selección de términos. Asimismo, los lotes de yogurt presentaron propiedades fisicoquímicas heterogéneas (p-valor<0.05) en relación con el color instrumental, pH, acidez titulable y sólidos solubles con excepción del índice de consistencia. Finalmente, estos hallazgos evidencian que el diseño de la ficha ejerce un efecto significativo en la respuesta de los consumidores asociado al proceso de percepción visual originado por el diseño, así como a características fisicoquímicas inherentes al producto como consecuencia del procesamiento tecnológico y comercialización.

Palabras clave:

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Referencias (VER)

ANDRADE OLIVEIRA, A.A.; ANDRADE, A.C.; CARVALHO BASTOS, S.C.; MARQUES PINHEIRO, A.C.; CONDINO, J. P. F.; CURZI JÚNIOR, A. 2021. Use of strawberry and vanilla natural flavors for sugar reduction: A dynamic sensory study with yogurt. Food Research International. 139:109972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109972 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109972

ARES, G.; JAEGER, S.R. 2015a. 11 - Check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions with consumers in practice: Experimental considerations and impact on outcome. En: Delarue, J.; Ben Lawlor, J.; Rogeaux, M. (eds.). Rapid sensory profiling techniques and related methods: Applications in new product development and consumer research. Woodhead Publishing Limited. p.227-245. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781782422587.2.227 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1533/9781782422587.2.227

ARES, G.; JAEGER, S.R. 2015b. Examination of sensory product characterization bias when check-all- that-apply (CATA) questions are used concurrently with hedonic assessments. Food Quality and Preference. 40(A):199-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.10.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.10.004

ARES, G.; ANTÚNEZ, L.; BRUZZONE, F.; VIDAL, L.; GIMÉNEZ, A.; PINEAU, B.; BERESFORD, M.K.; JIN, D.; PAISLEY, A.G.; CHHEANG, S.L.; ROIGARD, C.M.; JAEGER, S.R. 2015. Comparison of sensory product profiles generated by trained assessors and consumers using CATA questions: Four case studies with complex and/or similar samples. Food Quality and Preference. 45:75-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.05.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.05.007

ARES, G.; CUNHA DE ANDRADE, J.; ANTÚNEZ, L.; ALCAIRE, F.; SWANEY-STUEVE, M.; GORDON, S.; JAEGER, S.R. 2017. Hedonic product optimisation: CATA questions as alternatives to JAR scales. Food Quality and Preference. 55:67-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.08.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.08.011

ARYANA, K.J.; OLSON, D.W. 2017. A 100-year review: Yogurt and other cultured dairy products. Journal of Dairy Science. 100(12):9987-10013. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-12981 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-12981

AUGENBLICK, N.; NICHOLSON, S. 2016. Ballot position, choice fatigue, and voter behavior. Review of Economic Studies. 83(2):460-480. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdv047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdv047

BARTON, A.; HAYWARD, L.; RICHARDSON, C.D.; MCSWEENEY, M.B. 2020. Use of different panellists (experienced, trained, consumers and experts) and the projective mapping task to evaluate white wine. Food Quality and Preference. 83:103900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103900

BELUSSO, A.C.; NOGUEIRA, B.A.; BREDA, L.S.; MITTERER-DALTOÉ, M.L. 2016. Check all that apply (CATA) as an instrument for the development of fish products. Food Science and Technology. 36(2):275-281. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-457X.0026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-457X.0026

BLOM-HANSEN, J.; ELKLIT, J.; SERRITZLEW, S.; VILLADSEN, L.R. 2016. Ballot position and election results: Evidence from a natural experiment. Electoral Studies. 44:172-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.06.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.06.019

CASTURA, J.C.; ANTÚNEZ, L.; GIMÉNEZ, A.; ARES, G. 2016. Temporal Check-All-That-Apply (TCATA): A novel dynamic method for characterizing products. Food Quality and Preference. 47(A):79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.06.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.06.017

CRUZ, A.G.; CADENA, R.S.; CASTRO, W.F.; ESMERINO, E.A.; RODRIGUES, J.B.; GAZE, L.; FARIA, J.A.F.; FREITAS, M.Q.; DELIZA, R.; BOLINI, H.M.A. 2013. Consumer perception of probiotic yogurt: Performance of check all that apply (CATA), projective mapping, sorting and intensity scale. Food Research International. 54(1):601–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2013.07.056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2013.07.056

DE CARVALHO, D.A.; VALENTE, G.D.F.S.; ASSUMPÇÃO, G.M.P. 2018. External preference map to evaluate the acceptance of light and diet yogurt prepared using natural sweeteners. Ciencia Rural. 48(6):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20170941 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20170941

DESHWAL, G.K.; TIWARI, S.; KUMAR, A.; RAMAN, R.K.; KADYAN, S. 2021. Review on factors affecting and control of post-acidification in yoghurt and related products. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 109:499-512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.057

DELARUE, J.; BEN LAWLOR, J.; ROGEAUX, M. 2015. Rapid sensory profiling techniques: Applications in new product development and consumer research. Woodhead Publishing. 594p.

DOS SANTOS, B.A.; BASTIANELLO CAMPAGNOL, P.C.; DA CRUZ, A.G.; GALVÃO, M.T.E.L.; MONTEIRO, R.A.; WAGNER, R.; POLLONIO, M.A.R. 2015. Check all that apply and free listing to describe the sensory characteristics of low sodium dry fermented sausages: Comparison with trained panel. Food Research International. 76:725-734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.06.035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.06.035

FAVALLI, S.; SKOV, T.; BYRNE, D.V. 2013. Sensory perception and understanding of food uniqueness: From the traditional to the novel. Food Research International. 50:176-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2012.10.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2012.10.007

FLEMING, E.E.; ZIEGLER, G.R.; HAYES, J.E. 2015. Check-all-that-apply (CATA), sorting, and polarized sensory positioning (PSP) with astringent stimuli. Food Quality and Preference. 45:41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.05.004

HASHEMI GAHRUIE, H.; ESKANDARI, M.H.; MESBAHI, G.; HANIFPOUR, M.A. 2015. Scientific and technical aspects of yogurt fortification: A review. Food Science and Human Wellness. 4(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2015.03.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2015.03.002

JAEGER, S.R.; ALCAIRE, F.; HUNTER, D.C.; JIN, D.; CASTURA, J.C.; ARES, G. 2018. Number of terms to use in temporal check-all-that-apply studies (TCATA and TCATA Fading) for sensory product characterization by consumers. Food Quality and Preference. 64:154-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.09.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.09.013

JAEGER, S.R.; BERESFORD, M.K.; PAISLEY, A.G.; ANTÚNEZ, L.; VIDAL, L.; CADENA, R.S.; GIMÉNEZ, A.; ARES, G. 2015. Check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions for sensory product characterization by consumers: Investigations into the number of terms used in CATA questions. Food Quality and Preference. 42:154-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.02.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.02.003

JANIASKI, D.R.; PIMENTEL, T.C.; CRUZ, A.G.; PRUDENCIO, S.H. 2016. Strawberry-flavored yogurts and whey beverages: What is the sensory profile of the ideal product? Journal of Dairy Science. 99(7):5273-5283. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10097

JASTER, H.; AREND, G. D.; REZZADORI, K.; CHAVES, V. C.; REGINATTO, F. H.; PETRUS, J. C. C. 2018. Enhancement of antioxidant activity and physicochemical properties of yogurt enriched with concentrated strawberry pulp obtained by block freeze concentration. Food Research International. 104:119-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.10.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.10.006

KIM, M.R.; HEO, J.A.; KWAK, H.S. 2023. Comparison of sensory profiles by two different check-all-that-apply (CATA) terms developed from trained panelists and naïve consumers. Food Quality and Preference, 109:104902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104902 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104902

LAWLESS, H. T.; HEYMANN, H. 2010. Sensory evaluation of food. Segunda edición. Springer. 596p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6488-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6488-5_11

LICHTERS, M.; MÖSLEIN, R.; SARSTEDT, M.; SCHARF, A. 2021. Segmenting consumers based on sensory acceptance tests in sensory labs, immersive environments, and natural consumption settings. Food Quality and Preference. 89:104138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104138 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104138

MACEDO Y RAMÍREZ, R.C.; VÉLEZ-RUÍZ, J.F. 2015. Propiedades fisicoquímicas y de flujo de un yogur asentado enriquecido con microcápsulas que contienen ácidos grasos omega 3. información tecnológica 26(5):87-96. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642015000500012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642015000500012

MEYNERS, M.; CASTURA, J. 2014. Chapter 11 Check-All-That-Apply Questions. En: Varela, P.; Ares, G. (Eds.). Novel techniques in sensory characterization and consumer profiling. Taylor & Francis. Volumen 88. 271-306p.

MIELE, N.A.; CABISIDAN, E.K.; BLAIOTTA, G.; LEONE, S.; MASI, P.; DI MONACO, R.; CAVELLA, S. 2017. Rheological and sensory performance of a protein-based sweetener (MNEI), sucrose, and aspartame in yogurt. Journal of Dairy Science. 100(12):9539-9550. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-12894 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-12894

MINISTERIO DE DESARROLLO AGRARIO Y RIEGO-MINAGRI. 2017. Decreto supremo que aprueba el reglamento de la leche y productos lácteos. Disponible desde Internet en: http://www.digesa.minsa.gob.pe/orientacion/DS_7_2017_MINAGRI.pdf

MOKRZYCKI, W.; TATOL, M. 2011. Color difference Delta E - A survey. Machine Graphics and Vision. 20(4):383-411.

MOUSSAOUI, K.A.; VARELA, P. 2010. Exploring consumer product profiling techniques and their linkage to a quantitative descriptive analysis. Food Quality and Preference. 21(8):1088-1099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.09.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.09.005

ŚCIBISZ, I.; ZIARNO, M. 2023. Effect of Fermented Matrix on the Color and Stability of Strawberry and Blueberry Anthocyanins during the Storage of Fruit Yogurts and Soy-Based and Bean-Based Fruit Yogurt Alternatives. Molecules. 28: 6222. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28176222 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28176222

SÖDERLUND, P.; VON SCHOULTZ, Å.; PAPAGEORGIOU, A. 2021. Coping with complexity: Ballot position effects in the Finnish open-list proportional representation system. Electoral Studies. 71:102330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102330 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102330

SOUKOULIS, C.; PANAGIOTIDIS, P.; KOURELI, R.; TZIA, C. 2007. Industrial yogurt manufacture: Monitoring of fermentation process and improvement of final product quality. Journal of Dairy Science. 90(6):2641–2654. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-802 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-802

SYMONEAUX, R.; GALMARINI, M. V.; MEHINAGIC, E. 2012. Comment analysis of consumer’s likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping. A case study on apples. Food Quality and Preference. 24(1):59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.08.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.08.013

TORRICO, D.D.; TAM, J.; FUENTES, S.; VIEJO, C. G.; DUNSHEA, F.R. 2019. D-tagatose as a sucrose substitute and its effect on the physico-chemical properties and acceptability of strawberry-flavored yogurt. Foods. 8(7):256. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8070256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8070256

WANG, H.; WANG, C. N.; GUO, M. R. 2019. Effects of addition of strawberry juice pre- or postfermentation on physiochemical and sensory properties of fermented goat milk. Journal of Dairy Science. 102(6):4978–4988. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15750 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15750

XIA, Y.; SONG, J.; LEE, P. Y.; SHEN, H.; HOU, J.; YANG, J.; GAO, B.; ZHONG, F. 2020. Impact of consumption frequency on generations of sensory product profiles using CATA questions: Case studies with two drink categories. Food Research International. 137(June):109378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109378 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109378

YASNI, S.; MAULIDYA, A. 2014. Development of corn milk yoghurt using mixed culture of Lactobacillus delbruekii, Streptococcus salivarus, and Lactobacillus casei. HAYATI Journal of Biosciences. 21(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.4308/hjb.21.1.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4308/hjb.21.1.1

Citado por

Artículos similares

<< < 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 > >> 

También puede {advancedSearchLink} para este artículo.

Datos de la Publicación

Métrica
Éste artículo
Otros artículos
Pares Evaluadores 
0
2.4

Perfiles de revisores  N/D

Declaraciones del autor

Declaraciones del autor
Éste artículo
Otros artículos
Datos de Investigación 
No
16%
Financiación externa 
No
32%
Conflicto de Intereses 
N/D
11%
Métrica
Para esta revista
Otras Revistas
Tasa de aceptación 
16%
33%
Tiempo publicación (días) 
376
145
Editor y consejo editorial:
Perfiles
Institución responsable 
Universidad de Ciencias Aplicadas UDCA
Editora: 
Universidad de Ciencias Aplicadas y Ambientales U.D.C.A